Maximizing efficiency in InterPlan Systems’ eTaskMaker relies on transitioning from static, time-consuming project planning templates to dynamic, parametric estimating. eTaskMaker generates customized project schedules, task descriptions, resource assignments, and predecessor logic based on dynamic user responses.
The following best practices outline how to maximize efficiency using the software’s core features. 1. Leverage Parametric Generation Over Static Templates
Ditch static templates: Avoid manually modifying standard text-based templates, which often requires painstakingly adding, deleting, or adjusting tasks and durations.
Answer the Wizard accurately: Use the eTaskMaker Wizard to answer multiple-choice and quantitative questions about the physical scope of your turnaround or maintenance work.
Generate dynamic schedules: Allow the software to compile custom, resource-loaded project schedules instantly based on your inputs, significantly reducing manual data-entry errors. 2. Customize and Refine the Estimating Library
Utilize the Module Editor: Use the eTaskMaker Module Editor to adjust underlying estimating formulas permanently so they align with your facility’s unique historical performance and productivity norms.
Integrate local factors: Apply global productivity adjustments or granular corrections directly inside the estimate display to account for specific local field conditions before exporting.
Capture corporate knowledge: Continuously extend the built-in library by creating custom modules for unique equipment or specialized processes, preserving institutional expertise across the planning team. 3. Cross-Train Your Planning Team
Bridge knowledge gaps: Deploy the standardized estimating library to help less-experienced planners comfortably manage and estimate complex work outside their core discipline (e.g., allowing a mechanical planner to accurately estimate piping demolition or electrical tasks).
Standardize output norms: Standardize the structural formatting of all tasks, milestones, and durations across the department to ensure organizational consistency. 4. Optimize Export Settings for CPM Scheduling
Align with downstream software: Tailor your data structure within eTaskMaker to seamlessly match your target Critical Path Method (CPM) tools, such as Primavera (P6), Microsoft Project, or SAP R/3 PM.
Review predecessor logic: Verify that the calculated task logic relationships transfer intact to eliminate the need for manual scheduling adjustments once the data is exported.
If you are looking to audit your current system, let me know:
What scheduling tool (e.g., Primavera P6, MS Project) you export into?
What specific work scope (e.g., piping, valves, towers) gives your team the most trouble?
If your team currently uses the Module Editor or relies purely on out-of-the-box norms?
I can provide targeted tips for structuring your exact workflow. eTaskMaker – Frequently Asked Questions – InterPlan Systems
Leave a Reply